>> ASIAONE / BUSINESS / NEWS / MY MONEY / STORY
Salma Khalik
Wed, Feb 13, 2008
The Straits Times
Insurance alone cannot pay the big bills

MEDISHIELD premiums are set to rise again, just three years after an extensive overhaul of the Medisave-based insurance scheme.

Health Minister Khaw Boon Wan decided on this course to give subsidised patients some relief from having to fork out too much in cash. He wants patients with bills of $10,000 or more to pay less than the 40 per cent they now have to fork out.

Only 'a small percentage' of subsidised patients are landed with such huge bills each year, said his ministry's spokesman. But the pain from such out-of-pocket payment can be crippling.

But how are such large bills accumulated in the first place?

The Health Ministry gives two main causes: days spent in intensive care units (ICU) and expensive, but better quality, implants.

How is it possible that, even with the generous medical financing in place, subsidised patients still need to make hefty out-of- pocket payments?

The answer turns on the kinds of treatment a subsidised patient is eligible for. Such a patient, for example, cannot pick the more expensive drug eluting stent that keeps arteries open, if his doctor does not think it is necessary.

A patient who insists on the stent must switch to a private ward class. So subsidised patients, by definition, are given only treatments that doctors say they need.

For such treatments, the Government pays about 80 per cent of the bill for C class patients and 65 per cent for B2 class patients. On top of that, the Government also absorbs the 7 per cent Goods and Services Tax for them.

Granted, the above doesn't explain a $10,000 out-of-pocket payment, unless the total bill for a C Class patient is $50,000. But a closer look at the make-up of the bill will shed some light,

The subsidy for ICU ward fees for C class patients ranges from about 66 per cent to 85 per cent, with patients paying between $100 and $200 a day. They also need to pay for the medication and treatment they get in ICU.

Some may require medicines that are not on the subsidised list. For example, haemophiliacs who lack the coagulant that stops bleeding may need 10 to 12 vials of a non-subsidised medicine to stop them from bleeding to death following surgery. At $1,500 a vial, the total bill can be staggering.

Such medicine is not subsidised, since there are cheaper coagulants available. For the small number of patients for whom the cheaper drug is not effective, getting the expensive one is a matter of life and death.

MediShield insurance allows claims of up to a maximum of $500 daily for ICU stay and treatment. And at $1,500 a vial, the medicine alone would more than bust the limit.

Implants, too, can be very expensive. A spinal implant, for example, could set a patient back by up to $18,000.

The 1993 White Paper on Affordable Health Care called for basic medical care to be heavily subsidised. It defined basic medical care as 'essential and cost-effective medical treatment of proven value for illnesses, without which the patient's health and quality of life will be significantly compromised'.

This did not include 'artificial appliances other than the most basic models for the heart, hips, knees, etc'.

As a result, the subsidy on implants was capped at 50 per cent of the cost of the implant, up to a maximum of $500, for patients in both B2 and C class wards.

This means that if the implant costs $1,000, the Government will pay $500 or the full 50 per cent subsidy. But if the implant is more expensive, the percentage subsidised will be lower than half. A $2,000 implant will have only a 25 per cent subsidy, while a $5,000 implant will get only a 10 per cent subsidy.

Orthopaedic implants are no longer a rarity, with thousands of patients getting them every year - mainly for the knees, hips and spine. Singapore General Hospital alone carries out about 100 knee implants a month.

BETTER UTILISATION

Nicer surroundings would be welcome, of course. But better still would be if funds could be channelled to B2 and C class patients to give them the full 65 per cent and 80 per cent subsidies for needed treatments.

In the 15 years since the White Paper was drawn up, orthopaedic implants have become part and parcel of basic medical care - without which quality of life will be 'significantly compromised''. No one would want an artificial knee or vertebra unless it were medically necessary.

While only several hundred people may need spinal implants each year, the cost is high, between $2,500 and $18,000 each. At the higher end of the price range, the subsidy for a C class patient does not even come to 3 per cent. Those with MediShield can claim up to $2,500 for implants.

With such big bills, Mr Khaw's plans to tweak MediShield seems a perfectly rational way to help patients defray medical costs. The obvious solution is for the insurer to cover a bigger portion of the bill. But for them to be able to do so, premiums must go up.

Perhaps we should also ask other questions: Is the Government subsidy for C and B2 patients sufficient and equitable in the first place? Should the 15-year-old definition of what constitutes basic medical care be broadened?

If implants are considered part of basic health care, then a C Class patient's share of a $18,000 implant would be 20 per cent or $3,600. With MediShield insurance, his out-of-pocket payment will be just $1,100 - a sum that many patients can dip into their Medisave to pay for.

Expecting insurance - which means the 2.8 million people insured under MediShield - to make up for the shortfall in subsidy seems to be passing the burden of caring for the poor to people who have taken the precaution of buying insurance.

When Mr Khaw was pushing for means testing at public hospitals, he took the view that society should not begrudge poorer patients better quality health care.

He was referring to improvements in the quality of subsidised wards today, with the promise of more improvements in future.

Nicer surroundings would be welcome, of course. But better still would be if funds could be channelled to B2 and C class patients to give them the full 65 per cent and 80 per cent subsidies for needed treatments. Patients would then not have to face such enormous out-of-pocket payments.

Orthopaedic implants are generally needed by the elderly, many of whom do not have medical insurance. MediShield also stops covering patients once they reach the age of 85.

Raising the insurance payout is not going to help them, but increasing the subsidy will.

Is this article useful to you?
 

 
STORY INDEX
 
  Insurance alone cannot pay the big bills
   
 
  Flexible annuities scheme to start in 2013
   
 
  Workers with under $40k in minimum sum exempted CPF Life scheme
   
 
  Dangerous investing behaviour linked to thrill seeking, says study
   
 
  Case helps get back $4m from dodgy deals
   
 
  Undercover analysts get their day in the sun
   
 
  Bumper year for S'pore's life insurance business
   
 
  Annuity scheme could start in 2013
   
 
  GIC can still invest in another troubled bank, says Tony Tan
   
 
  Timeshare owners in the West see assets turn into liabilities
   
>> RELATED STORY
Insurance alone cannot pay the big bills
She puts aside nine months of salary for emergencies
Financial planner saves half his annual income
She builds portfolio to reduce reliance on salary
Will splitting funds between 2 annuities lower risk?

Elsewhere in AsiaOne...

Investor Relations: BH Global MD insures himself for $5 million

News: Samsung insurance arm raided in corruption probe

Travel: Travel insurance

Health: Insurance alone cannot pay the big bills

Motoring: Choosing the best insurance for your car

 

We welcome contributions, comments and tips.
a1admin@sph.com.sg
Search: