>> ASIAONE / BUSINESS / MY MONEY / BUILDING YOUR NEST EGG / INSURANCE / STORY
Mon, Oct 19, 2009
The Straits Times
Investment-linked policies can benefit customers

I REFER to Mr Tan Kin Lian's letter on Tuesday, 'Hidden charges in insurance policies'.

Mr Tan seems to highlight only the disadvantages of an investment-linked policy (ILP) without mentioning how policyholders may benefit from it.

Related link:
» Hidden insurance charges? I don't think so...

There is a yearly renewable term assurance coverage incorporated into an ILP that allows a policyholder to get the necessary coverage at a premium that is normally lower than a level term plan. This allows the policyholder to direct a larger portion of the premium into investments, compared to the policyholder who gets a pure term plan.

When the policyholder nears retirement age, which is when mortality charges increase significantly, he is advised to reduce his coverage as his investment should have accumulated to a level where he can self-insure a larger part of the original sum assured.

Mr Tan also seems to emphasise that the unallocated investments during the initial years are used to pay a high commission to the agent.

Not all insurance companies pay a high commission. There are companies that charge the policyholder reasonably and pay the agent reasonably. An agent should be compensated for the advice, time and the years of service that he has to provide to the policyholder.

Mr Tan's letter might create an impression that all insurance agents aim to hide charges from their customers. There are certainly black sheep in the industry, but they should not be grouped together with advisers who are transparent with their clients.

The letter might also create the impression that agents get 100 per cent of the unallocated investments. We must not forget that there are many other departments in an insurance company that are direct or indirect beneficiaries of these funds.

I agree with Mr Tan that the current charges for ILP are generally high. I encourage buyers to make comparisons before deciding to buy such plans.

The Monetary Authority of Singapore could consider setting a cap on how much an insurance company can charge for such policies. I also look forward to innovations from insurers on how they design plans for the benefit of the policyholder, company as well as the adviser.

Adrian Khiat

This article was first published in The Straits Times.

 

 
STORY INDEX
 
  Hidden insurance charges? I don't think so...
   
 
  Investment-linked policies can benefit customers
   
 
  New insurance law addresses pitfalls of trusts
   
 
  S'poreans grossly under-insured: Study
   
 
  Insurance still important in recession
   
 
  In hard times, take cover
   
 
  Girls just gotta have funds
   
 
  Consultant has all bases covered
   
 
  Bye to archaic life policy law
   
 
  Income launches 3-pronged plan
   
>> RELATED STORY
Hidden insurance charges? I don't think so...
Hidden charges in insurance policies
New insurance law addresses pitfalls of trusts
Insurance for foreign workers to be raised
Aviva to grow market share in S'pore

Elsewhere in AsiaOne...

Investor Relations: BH Global MD insures himself for $5 million

News: 1% lost MediShield last year

Travel: Banks should scrutinise travel-insurance plans

Health: Lack of insurance cover for H1N1-affected travel

Motoring: Accident victim gets insurance shock

 

We welcome contributions, comments and tips.
a1admin@sph.com.sg